I hope you'll come see us now that we are blogging at our new site Paine Publishing. Lots more good measurement stuff there. See you there!
« September 2013 | Main | January 2014 »
I hope you'll come see us now that we are blogging at our new site Paine Publishing. Lots more good measurement stuff there. See you there!
October 31, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Just got back from a great time in Victoria, BC at the IABC Canadian West Conference. Once of the best parts was all learning how the award winning programs measured results. Most were in total compliance with The Barcelona Principles -- tying results back to original goals and business results. Congrats one and all!
For those who wanted copies of my speech, it's here: Download IABC Victoria October 2013
October 24, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0)
As PR agencies finally wake up to the new integrated marketing world. they are increasingly throwing about the term “PESO” to refer to Paid, Earned Shared and Owned” content. Why they would want to brag about their results using something that is currently worth less than a penny to be exact) is beyond me. Or perhaps that is exactly what its worth.
In reality the way most of the agencies (excepting of course those rarified few who have already modified their measurement practices to be in compliance with the Social Media Measurement Standards) throw about terms like engagement and influence they might as well be worth $0.07
As it happens, The Conclave spent quite a bit of time already debating whether “shared” content deserved its own category, and in fact debated it again two weeks ago when we met. And we still came to the same conclusion. When someone shares a piece of content, that share is “earned” because presumably someone felt the content was good enough to share. In other words it earned the right to be shared. So why do we need yet another category? In fact when a media outlet posts a piece of content it is designed to be shared, so the shared category is essentially redundant.
Every time The Conclave has had this discussion, we have concluded that the correct terminology should be POE, Paid, Owned and Earned. And why wouldn’t you want an acronym that reminds one of one of America’s greatest poets?, More importantly, this great poet already has some history in the field of measurement.
I refer of course to that greatest of American measurement creations, Measurement Maven Danielle Brigida’s classic, the Return:
The Return
by Danielle Brigida, National Wildlife Federation
Once upon a non-profit theory, measurement was weak and weary,
Over many a quaint and curious meetings with little to account for,
While I nodded, nearly napping, an idea for a strategy came a tapping,
What if measurement could include social interactions and what they stand for?
I shall investigate - I muttered - to know what ROI could account for
Instantly I knew, this was something I must explore
Ah, distinctly I remember, I wanted the opinion of a member,
Because it is each separate inspiring member, That I do wildlife justice for
So I tweeted, questions and links, to see what each member thinks
But from my stats surcease of sorrow, I realized - some things you can’t keep score
Aside from rare and radiant traffic spikes, there was nothing traditional to record
I thought this it is, and nothing more.
It was our executive VP who had unfounded belief in me,
Thrilled me filled me with fantastic insight I’d never known before;
So that now, to still the ADD of my moving mind, she stood repeating
"Remember at NWF it's revenue, reach and engagement that we push for
Keep this is mind for what you measure - for this is all I will implore
Only this and nothing more.
Suddenly, my soul grew stronger; hesitating then no longer,
You sure? said I, for Madam, truly it's a return hard to account for
But the fact was I kept tracking, never loafing, never slacking
And so slightly traffic came tapping, tapping on my website door,
I used listening to confirm I saw it - then I recorded to be sure
Not just linkbacks here but something more.
Deep into the analytics peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing
Listening, and dreaming dreams no marketer ever dared to dream before
Instead of traditional ROI abounding, I saw something even more astounding
And the only thing I could think was How can I measure engagement more?
This I whispered, and an echo murmured back the word "explore"
Merely this and nothing more.
Back into my cubicle turning, all the questions within me burning,
Soon again I started tweeting more strategically than before.
'Surely,' said I, 'surely there's a chance for program assistance;
Let me see then, a potential instance, and this mystery explore -
Let my mind be still a moment and this mystery explore; -
'Tis a test and nothing more!'
Wildlife watch - an idea release, it holds the key engagement piece,
For people who spot all from crickets to geese, can use twitter to tweet
With #NWF as the hash tag; Wildlife sightings perhaps would not lag; (for all to brag?)
Updates made by phones to twitter, are searched more easily than before -
Searched using Twitter Search with no URL to look for -
Perhaps with this we will engage more.
With the wildlife we're compiling, We could keep the scientists smiling,
And lose the grave and stern decorum that was our storytelling before,
'Though tweets are short and fitted,' I said, we'll increase the total submitted
Ghastly grim and empty forums we'll be faced with nevermore!
Tell me what thy wildlife name is on the twitter feed-but be sure!
Share the findings, 'forever more.'
Then, methought, the air grew denser, social media had no censor
There were still those unbelieving, even worse were those misperceiving
That Twitter was the answer to all their programs' problems evermore.
`At last,' they cried, `thy God hath lent thee -- social media -- the angel -- sent thee
Traffic, comments, tweets and other means of engagement to record.
Yet it is important to remember, that goals determine the ROI accounted for
Forget this, `Nevermore.'
So there I was, sitting lonely needing support, but thinking only,
For Social media change we needed to move past communication days of yore
A little birdy told the web team "We should use a twitter stream"
And the idea, instead of dying was kept alive and continued flying
Till I found myself crying `Wow this is much easier than before -
With Twitter, Facebook, Digg and Stumbleupon gone are the days forgotten lore.
Doubting social media, `Nevermore.'
Though I feel the time spent disputing could be better spent recruiting
On the social sites that are intuitively fantastic for good rapport
It is my job to continue thinking how to keep goals and return from sinking
But trying to pinpoint every intangible value is simply uncalled for
Though I love data, traditional numbers are so far from social media at it's core
It's the relationships I adore
As for complete measurement, we're still waiting, we're still waiting
And anxiously anticipating metrics that assign value even more;
And my hopes have all the seeming of a marketer still dreaming,
That my efforts not in vain, will yield intangibles and metrics all the same
And that all the hours invested carefully will open future media doors
This I hope and so much more.
October 24, 2013 in Rants, Social Media Measurement | Permalink | Comments (2)
Talk about bizaar shifts in the unverse -- Is it just me or does this headline make no sense in today's business environment?
Ad Execs: 'Results' No Longer Top Factor Driving Media Buys
In what appears to be a significant shift in the criteria they use for valuing the media companies they do business with, ad executives say the ability of a media supplier to generate “ad results” is no longer the most important factor for getting on a media plan. Other factors, including “aggressive rate deals,” are now considered marginally more important factors.
Isn't it surpremely ironic that after years of preaching to PR people abou measuring real outcomes, just as they are starting to really embrace the notion that they can and should measure results, their counterparts on the ad side, who control most of the money, have decided that actual results are not worth county. It does make you wonder what IS worth counting? If what the Ad Execs are looking for is "deals" -- why not just go to talk to your PR department?
October 23, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0)
October 14, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0)
but of course they were too long for Twitter, not quite Haiku
Russian, German, Polish, French, Kiwi, Aussie, Canadian -- a couple from Calgary, no less, New York Jewish American.
I couldn't agree more.
October 14, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0)
I’m writing this overlooking a bird’s-eye view of San Terenzo
on Italy’s Cinque Terre coast and its bird’s-eye view of the Mediterraneum does make it a great place for some reflection.
I spent the last few days in Milan, giving this speech on Social Media Measurement
Download Lundquist Swisscorner in Milan, and also participating in the third European Digital Leadership Conference, a retreat in the Piedmont region of Italy organized by Joakim Lundquist. Joakim runs the incredibly innovative and foreward thinking Lundquist social media agency, based in Milan.
The 2-day retreat took place at Villa “D’Amelia” a gorgeous guest house in the middle of the Piedmont wine region. Yes, we did have a bit of a tasting of the excellent wines produced in that area, but the real purpose of these conferences, is "to help develop outstanding digital leaders and equip them with the strategic vision and essential skills needed to manage their company’s digital communications. The initiative is built around a series of “retreats”, intimate and closed-door gatherings for exchange and thought leadership discussions among members."
This particular retreat included such European communications luminaries as Alessandro Bastoni of Telecom Italia, Massimo Guarnieri, head of digital enterprise at ENI the Italian energy company, Douwe Hilarius, Corporate identiy and web manager at Fiat industrial and his colleague Paula Inda Director, Brand Communications at of Case/IT Agriculture. And of course, for added fun, the ever provocative social media business guru, Richard Binhammer
former social strategist at Dell.
Here we all are:
What emerged was a refrain that I have heard for the past few years in similar conferences in the US and the Middle East: While there is a need for better measurement of real business outcomes from social strategies, the proliferation of vanity metrics like followers and fans consistently gets in the way.
Bob Garfield would find fertile ground here for his anti-eyeball messages. Marketers are still looking for those big numbers, and when confronted with much more meaningful metrics like the percent of all those “likes” that are actually engaged in sharing and commenting on your content, the numbers are just too small to register in the marekters’ minds. Garfield would suggest that it is just a matter of time before the companies that continue down the “shouting ever louder” path must change or die.
That may be true in the US where efficiency is valued above all, but if you are doing business across the pond and the channel, the Relationship Era hasn't arrived, it never left.
Relationships are seen as far more important than how much you can produce for the least cost. Business is built around relationships and therefore the impression already takes a back seat to the personal connection. The problem is that social here has never even been contemplated as a means to better relationships. Relationships are forged in person, at dinner, on a sailboat, or at a retreat. And yes, there is some appreciation for Social's impact on customer satisfaction, but that seldom enters into the communications conversation.
Social is seen as a medium of growing influence and imminent danger. The stories of social media’s dumbest moves and frequent disasters are well known, as are all the rules and regulations that govern disclosure, privacy and other aspects of business that most of us in the US ignore. As a result the European C-Suite has seen social more as a means to a more efficient way of amplifying message than as the social business strategy it should be.
The good news is that the partipicants in both the Executive Digital Leadership Forum, and many of the attendees at the breakfast that I participated in, understand the real value of social. The challenge for them, as it is with their peers in the states, to convince their bosses of the truth. The good news is that as measurement techniques improve, and real value metrics are applied more frequently, the data will reveal the reality.
October 10, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (1)
Tags: binhammer, bog garfield, can't buy me like, cinque terre, italy, Lundquist, milan, piedmont, relais villa amelia, social media measurement, the relationship era, wine
When I was a reporter if you got two people to agree on something it was considered a trend. Based on three posts I read to day, I'm declaring a new trend: Organizations are beginning to understand that social media is a long term benefit and looking for short-term ROI is a waste of tiem.
This piece in Business Insider says it best.
Then there was this piece on how organizations use Social Media with the most interesting concluding being: Companies with broader benefits from social media are more likely to have a large internal "social circle" with multiple functions working closely together on social media.
Then there was this in AdAge, essentially promoting the idea that "wasting time on idiots" is actually a better strategy. I could'nt agree more.
Finally, the shift in Twitter strategy to work on its influence on TV watchers and Nielsen's new Twitter metrics give us something more to think about.
Discuss pleas...
October 08, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0)
For three days last week, I had some of the world’s best and brightest “Measurati” at my house to talk about the future of measurement.
On Wednesday, Shankhassick Farm hosted the IPR’s annual Measurement Summit, followed by a traditional New Hampshire lobster and clambake.
The two-days of meetings began with Don Stacks
discussing a provocative topic: Ethics in communication research. Respondents and research subjects are increasingly concerned about privacy. Further complicating the issue is that as data proliferates and the pressure for good metrics increases, clients are not asking the right questions of their research suppliers. As a result they are getting bad data, or worse – incorrect conclusions.
There were far too many disturbing stories of how data is glossed over or ignored in an effort please the clients and/or come in at the lowest price.The general conclusion is that Ethical standards for research, especially in social media, need to be established.
Stacks was followed by, Mark Stouse, Global Vice President at Honeywell,
discussed the details of his groundbreaking work integrating CRM and communications data to show the direct connection between communications and revenue. Essentially he delivers a monthly and quarterly report that measuers how communications delivers qualified leads and account wins.
His message was that yes, PR and Social Media CAN be measured, and that having the right strategic framework for your measurement is far more important than the tools you use.
For me, the highlight of the week was Bob Garfield's keynote
Garfield in person is even better than his book, Can't Buy Me Like, co-authored with Doug Levy. Garfield stark messaget -- that it is the end of the media world as we know it, is delivered with a wonderful mix of sardonic humor, wit and charm. Essentially his message is that the media as we know it is over -- the the endless pursuit of impressions, and our tendency to just keep shouting ever louder, will no longer work in what he calls The Relationship Era.
Despite his prodigous persuasive abilities, I'm guessing from the faces that there were at least a couple of people in the audience that weren't quite ready to read an obituary of the metric most of them have been using for decades.Even more fun was sharing a lobster and a beer with him afterwards.
On Thursday, the Conclave, a group of industry associations, clients and their agencies, www.smmstandards.org. met to discuss the latest developments for social media measurement standards. The Conclave was born in my living room in October 2011 when talk about establishing standards for social media measurement began to be heard in corporate corridors around the world. On June 6th of this year we published the first ever, industry-approved Standards for Social Media Measurement.On October 3rd, the group, which includes social media managers and research heads from GM, Ford, Procter & Gamble, McDonalds, SAS and Southwest Airlines among others, agreed on three major points.
1. Our work was not done yet.
While the standards were approved, commented on and published, we understand that technology and societal norms would change, so as much as we like the idea that they are set in stone, we realize we will have to continue to update them as technology progressed. Specifically we will be doing minor iterations to the standards for sentiment, adding to the Transparency Table to make it more of a check list of questions that a client must be sure to ask their research supplier.
2. Our purpose is to promote, as well as set standards
The purpose of the group isn’t just to set the standards, but to promulgate tem and help others implement them. To that end we pledged to take the messages back to our companies, agency staff and associations that are key to spreading the wor
3. Examples need to be part of the standards
We will be adding examples for all the standards of both good and bad measurement – illustrating what is standards compliant and what is not.
4. We have, and will add a standards dictionary
We will add the newly published I{R dictionary o public relations measurement and research to the standards, since definitions are key to establishing standards.All in all, I'd say it was a pretty productive week!
October 05, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0)
Tags: Bob Garfield, IPR , On The Media, PR measurement, Social Media measurement, Social Media ROI, The Conclave
Recent Comments