It seems that almost all of my conversations lately have been about the need for some sort of standard metrics for social media measurement. My response is always the same as it has been for the last 2 decades of measuring communications: There can be no standard because there is no standard goal for "communications." Yes, there may have been a standard way to count eyeballs in print and television, (and the accuracy of that can be debated) but just reaching eyeballs is seldom the goal for a good strategic communications program, and the goal always drives the selection of your measurement tool. If you're the PR Manager for Mothers Against Drunk Driving, your goal is members, contributions and ultimately fewer drunk drivers, and fewer deaths. If you're Southwest airlines, it might be ticket sales. If you're the National Association of Manufacturers, the goal is influence and access to Capital Hill. If the goal is to improve relationships with your customers, you need to measure engagement. So establishing a standard metric for such diverse goals is clearly a waste of time. Each communicator needs to decide for him or herself what success means in terms of his/her own organization.
However, when it comes to judging media, if one accepts that each organization has a slightly different approach to success, KDPaine & Partners is proposing a non-standard standard for media measurement if you will. We call it the Optimum Content Score (OCS) . The good news is that it works for both traditional and social media and enables you to track progress over time and against the competition or peer institutions. This is how it works:
You define what the perfect article, TV spot, or Radio Mention, Blog Posting , Tweet etc. looks like. Presumably it would feature your brand prominently, it would contain a key message, it would position your brand favorably on whatever issues you care about etc. etc. Not all criteria are applicable in all situations, so you pick and chose from a list that might include the following:
- Visibility – where is the brand mentioned
- Dominance – how much is the brand mentioned, does it dominate, or is just mentioned in passing
- Messaging – does it contain one or more of your key messages? Or does it contain the opposite – a negative message or something you don't want to see in print
- Positioning – does it position your brand favorably on issues of importance to your audience?
- Who is quoted – are your thought leaders quoted or included?
- Tonality – does the article/item/posting leave the reader more or less likely to do business with you, support your cause, do whatever it is that you want them to do
- What type of conversation is taking place – there are 27 distinct types of conversation that we've identified. Understanding the nature of the conversation is critical to knowing what to do about it. Here are the 27: Presumably the most desirable would be expressing support or giving a shout-out, but again, it depends on the purpose of the program.
- Acknowledging receipt of information
- Advertising something
- Answering a question
- Asking a question
- Augmenting a previous post
- Calling for action
- Disclosing personal information
- Distributing media
- Expressing agreement
- Expressing criticism
- Expressing support
- Expressing surprise
- Giving a heads-up
- Responding to criticism
- Giving a shout-out
- Making a joke
- Making a suggestion
- Making an observation
- Offering a greeting
- Offering an opinion
- Putting out a wanted ad
- Rallying support
- Recruiting people
- Showing dismay
- Soliciting comments
- Soliciting help
- Starting a poll
Once you've determine what constitutes "Optimal content" you also need to decide what constitutes the opposite – the type of story you really wish would never appear.
You can then rate each item, posting, article or transcript according on a scale of + 1 to -1 depending on its content. You then average your score for the month/week/quarter (whatever timeframe is most appropriate). You will also need to do the same for your competitor's items. That way you can quickly see who is doing better or worse depending on your industry.
My only concern would be creating a perfect 'ideal' for a competitor or contemporary. For example, organisations in the same market probably won't have the same key messages. Instead could you create a sector-wide ideal against which you can compare? Hope this makes sense.
Posted by: winrar скачать | November 26, 2012 at 11:41 PM
Thank you for this great blog information!I'm finding this whole blogging world a great resource for any topic, and really inspirational.
tax attorney
Posted by: Edwin | November 05, 2012 at 01:00 AM
I recently came across your blog and have Been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I do not know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting.
Posted by: reverse mortgage calculator | November 04, 2012 at 10:52 PM
Your site has very useful information, I really enjoyed reading them. I’m thankful I found this one. Hope you can continue posting interesting updates like this one. I’m definitely going to bookmark your page.
Posted by: Wine Bar Cebu | October 30, 2012 at 10:52 PM
I was lucky enough to find your site, write your topic is very good, I have to take some time to learn from your knowledge of the site. Thank you for your ignorance to share your information to us.
Posted by: san diego divorce attorneys | October 23, 2012 at 08:57 PM
The good news is that it works for both traditional and social media and enables you to track progress over time and against the competition or peer institutions. This is how it works:
Posted by: restaurant furniture | October 23, 2012 at 06:44 AM
Attensa (the client) and their two top competitors.
Posted by: cover letter for sales | October 22, 2012 at 09:10 AM
I really happy to read this post,I was just imagine about it and you provided me the correct information I really bookmark it,for further reading,So thanks for sharing the information.
Posted by: mesothelioma attorneys | October 16, 2012 at 01:25 AM
This is just the information I am finding everywhere.Me and my friend were arguing about an issue similar to this! Now I know that I was right.Thanks for the information you post. I just subscribe your blog. This is a nice blog.
Posted by: stryker hip recall | October 15, 2012 at 02:48 PM
Anastaa loistava tapa otetaan käyttöön tämän aiheen. Se oli suuri etumatkaa on tämä. Kiitos ystävällisesti käyttöönotettaessa.
Posted by: mesothelioma lawyer | October 12, 2012 at 08:58 PM
Appropriate a great way of Being Introduced to this subject matter. It was great catching up is this. Thank you kindly For the introduction.
Posted by: pradaxa lawsuit | October 09, 2012 at 11:12 PM
Then your 'sentiment factor' of +1 or -1 is something I've done in conjunction with an SEM firm successfully for a client, where we measure positive, negative and neutral coverage for Attensa (the client) and their two top competitors.
Posted by: tax lawyer | September 29, 2012 at 01:09 AM
the same group as those using unethical (or illegal) methods of marketing. How about link-baiting or trolling? Splogging? Still under
Posted by: Mail Forwarding | August 22, 2012 at 09:21 AM
I think any posting could be considered the opposite of "optimal content" if it engages in one particular type of conversation as you mentioned, without being varied.
Posted by: Sharon J. | August 12, 2012 at 06:44 PM
Nice post.I like the way you start and then conclude your thoughts. Thanks for this information .I really appreciate your work, keep it up
Posted by: Top 10 songs | July 20, 2012 at 03:58 PM
I was just questioning if you have ever thought altering the layout of your site? It is exceptionally well composed. I simply love what you have said here but I think that you could do a bit more to let readers connect with your content better. You have got lots of content in your sites with very few images. I would suggest spacing it out better.
Posted by: Vorsorgen | June 21, 2012 at 07:14 PM
Post very nicely written, and it contains useful facts. I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement. Thanks for sharing with us
Posted by: Rochester Furniture | June 20, 2012 at 05:39 AM
I know this if off topic but I'm looking into starting my own weblog and was wondering what all is required to get setup? I'm assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
Posted by: roulette spielen | June 14, 2012 at 02:06 PM
Then your 'sentiment factor' of +1 or -1 is something I've done in conjunction with an SEM firm successfully for a client, where we measure positive, negative and neutral coverage for Attensa (the client) and their two top competitors.
Our monthly reports have turned into something extremely actionable from a PR perspective.
You've simply taken it to a whole new level.
Posted by: chota bheem game | June 09, 2012 at 04:56 PM
Then your 'sentiment factor' of +1 or -1 is something I've done in conjunction with an SEM firm successfully for a client, where we measure positive, negative and neutral coverage for Attensa (the client) and their two top competitors.
Posted by: nursing research articles | May 14, 2012 at 06:56 PM
I am very much pleased with the contents you have mentioned.I wanted to thank you for this great article.I enjoyed every little bit part of it and I will be waiting for the new updates.
Posted by: jeux de poker en ligne gratuit | May 14, 2012 at 07:53 AM
Then your 'sentiment factor' of +1 or -1 is something I've done in conjunction with an SEM firm successfully for a client, where we measure positive, negative and neutral coverage for Attensa (the client) and their two top competitors. - never!
Posted by: Imobiliare Cluj | February 21, 2012 at 09:23 AM
Thank you so much for providing individuals with an exceptionally splendid chance to discover important secrets from this site. It is usually very awesome and as well , packed with a good time for me personally and my office peers to visit your site nearly thrice every week to read through the latest things you have got.
Posted by: raspberry ketone | February 16, 2012 at 08:42 AM
Just a observation for you to consider would be; that often we Humans are not as organized in our thinking. This is to say that multiple items on your list are often mixed into one communication for non-obvious reasons.
Posted by: Colorado registered nurse training | February 14, 2012 at 02:29 PM
I like the thought that must go into determining optimal content.
You were fabulous at BlogPotomac, BTW. Look forward to learning more from you. ;-)
Posted by: Baby Clothes | February 14, 2012 at 02:27 PM
Houses are not very cheap and not every person can buy it. However, loan was created to support people in such cases.
Posted by: home loans | January 14, 2012 at 11:26 PM
its great I found your website perfect for my needs. It contains wonderful and helpful posts. I have read most of them and got a lot from them. To me, you are doing the great work.
Posted by: nlp techniques | October 24, 2011 at 05:04 PM
This was really very nice posting in this blog. I had really liked the stuff very much.
Posted by: essays help | October 19, 2011 at 02:28 AM
The collection is very good & amazing. Nice one to hold upon this. All the stuffs gives a meaning to the collection & symbolizes a lot. So overall good one
Posted by: Logo Design Contest | October 18, 2011 at 04:03 AM
Wow i was searching for the article regarding social media and now i got it, thanks admin, keep going.
Posted by: Essay Writing | October 18, 2011 at 01:41 AM
i really apreciate what you are sharing that i was searching for a while but know BOOKMARK
Posted by: nlp techniques | October 09, 2011 at 11:47 PM
I love your site, always nice to read of you new
Posted by: Shop | September 28, 2011 at 06:38 PM
Social networks and other social services are extremely popular now!
Posted by: essay buy | September 20, 2011 at 07:40 AM
My only concern would be creating a perfect 'ideal' for a competitor or contemporary. For example, organisations in the same market probably won't have the same key messages.
Posted by: wordpress premium themes | June 25, 2011 at 01:27 PM
This, because the brain like any other muscle in our body depends on blood flow to do its thing and the higher your metabolism and ability to sustain physical exercise at an beyond your aerobic threshold, the better 'oiled' is the machine to deliver continuously on what makes all of us smarter - learning.
It's hard to learn anything when you are tired, it's even harder when you are stressed and learning is what allows your brain to build more connections between neurons, which can potentially fire and give you ideas, helping you be more creative, think faster or even just make the right decision ahead of the wrong one. Worst of all, many of the high pressure jobs out there today requiring continuously operating at stress-levels, make learning all but impossible, so cycles of burn-out are not uncommon. We work hard, feel under pressure to do things better, smarter, faster so we get stressed, making it harder for us to learn howadf to do things differently, so we then get frustrated, which of course makes us even more stressed... you know the drill.
Posted by: true religion outlet | June 08, 2011 at 05:06 AM
It is good that people can take the mortgage loans moreover, that opens up new opportunities.
Posted by: SHARPE33Geraldine | May 28, 2011 at 10:35 PM
By upholding the principle of shared happiness, you can obtain much kind support, which is a starting point for success.
Posted by: cheap jordan retro | May 11, 2011 at 10:23 PM
Good to see the 27 distinct types of conversation that we have identified public works and public works energy.
Posted by: public works energy | April 22, 2010 at 08:34 AM
I've been advocating this kind of un-standard (great concept) for quite some time now. I'm glad you put a name on this, as this might help counter the hype surrounding standards for social media measurement. In addition, standards should be seen as something of the past in a time and age when there are so many communities, media, tools, platforms, etc. To each brand, to each campaign, a unique set of metrics and indicators. However, I think our industry should agree on mutually accepted standards and metrics, such as the 27 ones you use.
Anthony Hamelle
linkfluence
Posted by: anham | March 15, 2009 at 05:59 PM
28) Schadenfreude
There is no shortage of troublemakers who are not criticizing, not showing dismay, and not making a joke, but simply raising hell in a conversation for the sheer joy of it. Most YouTube, Slashdot and 4Chan comments are made by this type of person.
29) First to post!
Is this the digital equivalent of staking your flag in the soil? Is it conversation, self-verification or merely annoying? ;^)
I was going to add "Policing" (e.g., reporting a bad member on a social community), but I suppose #13, "Giving a heads up," covers that.
Here's a question, Katie. Do you consider spamming and legitimate advertising to be the same? I can't imagine clients would want to be lumped in the same group as those using unethical (or illegal) methods of marketing. How about link-baiting or trolling? Splogging? Still under #2?
(BTW, #28 and #29 — while true — were simply for your amusement. I generally involve myself in #16: Making a joke). ;^)
Posted by: Davezilla | January 04, 2009 at 04:08 PM
I enjoyed the article and the list of 27 possible interactions. Just a observation for you to consider would be; that often we Humans are not as organized in our thinking. This is to say that multiple items on your list are often mixed into one communication for non-obvious reasons.
Posted by: Jeffrey Kahn | July 14, 2008 at 03:14 AM
I enjoyed the article and the list of 27 possible interactions. Just a observation for you to consider would be; that often we Humans are not as organized in our thinking. This is to say that multiple items on your list are often mixed into one communication for non-obvious reasons.
Posted by: Jeffrey Kahn | July 14, 2008 at 03:12 AM
Thank you from Spain.
The 27 types of conversation helps us to make more professional our online marketing work.
http://redescolaborativas.blogspot.com
Posted by: Marcos Fargas | July 11, 2008 at 06:20 AM
Thanks for this post, it inspired me to write about measuring conversation in the social media space..... nearly impossible it seems
http://commetrics.com/?p=43
Posted by: WebUrs | July 10, 2008 at 04:17 PM
The concept of a notional match against 'perfection' holds real value in concept terms for measurement.
My only concern would be creating a perfect 'ideal' for a competitor or contemporary. For example, organisations in the same market probably won't have the same key messages. Instead could you create a sector-wide ideal against which you can compare? Hope this makes sense.
Posted by: Michael Blowers | June 20, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Sounds similar to the net promoter score, but I like the thought that must go into determining optimal content.
You were fabulous at BlogPotomac, BTW. Look forward to learning more from you. ;-)
Posted by: Lindy Dreyer | June 16, 2008 at 11:32 AM
I'll join your un-standard un-coalition for measurement!
First of all, it's stunning to see you've been able to devise a list of 27 types of conversation... upon a quick perusal, I wasn't able to add to any of them, which is exciting enough.
Then your 'sentiment factor' of +1 or -1 is something I've done in conjunction with an SEM firm successfully for a client, where we measure positive, negative and neutral coverage for Attensa (the client) and their two top competitors.
Our monthly reports have turned into something extremely actionable from a PR perspective.
You've simply taken it to a whole new level.
Cheers!
Posted by: Janet Johnson | June 16, 2008 at 10:00 AM