« Dispatch from the War on AVE: Ogilvy PR Drops AVEs | Main | 10 PR Measurement Fortune Cookies Based on the Wisdom of Confucius »

August 01, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451658a69e2014e8a4d8cc7970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Measurement Standard Contents for August 2011:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Joe Smith

I think you need to read what he wrote again:

"What’s been somewhat disappointing is that some measurement companies are trying to get attention or competitive advantage by going around accusing other measurement companies of still using AVEs. The companies making the accusations are often those who didn’t play a key role in Barcelona or Lisbon, and have been using AVEs themselves."

If I am correct he is describing your firm.

Bill Paarlberg

[Joe Smith's comment above is about this post: “David Rockland Sums Up the State of Measurement" which can be read here: http://tinyurl.com/3fsatjl ]

Thanks for your comment, Joe. I did notice that David said that. I am not sure what companies he is referring to, but it cannot include KDPaine & Partners, because:

-- Katie Paine _did_ play a key a key role in Barcelona and Lisbon.

-- And KDPaine & Partners, LLC _never has_ used AVEs.

It is true that Katie and I have argued vocally against the use of AVEs, and, yes, we have mentioned some specific companies who use AVEs. But we've been doing that for almost 20 years. And in that time we have proposed and promoted many alternatives to AVEs. Our goal has always been to do good measurement, not just get rid of bad measurement.

Joe, if you have some other reasons to believe David is referring to KDPaine & Partners, LLC, I would like to hear them.

Bill Paarlberg, Editor, The Measurement Standard

Joe Smith

You couldn't possibly be that naive! I suggest you ask your mentor about her "expert testimony".

Bill Paarlberg

I was uninformed about that particular situation. Thanks for the tip, Joe. And now that I am (at least partly) informed about it, it appears to me that:

-- It's a bigger can of worms than I want to, or am able to, dig into,

-- It appears to be a matter that was resolved in an appropriate private venue, and ought not to be aired in this blog or elsewhere in public.

Whatever the details, they do not alter the fact that Katie and I have been arguing against AVEs, and for alternative methods, for many years. Since before most PR pros thought much about measurement, and in fact since before most of our current measurement-related organizations or events even existed. We are glad that, as David pointed out, Barcelona has at last put AVEs behind us and the industry can concentrate on developing more proper techniques. --Bill

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Get us every month as a free email newsletter:

  • Just type your address here and click GO
    For Email Marketing you can trust

New Every Morning at 7:30 am...

  • The Measurement Standard Daily Digest is an automatically compiled collection of public relations measurement-related posts from around the Web.

Great Minds on Measurement

  • Lawrence M. Krauss“I cannot stress often enough that what science is all about is not proving things to be true but proving them to be false.” --Lawrence M. Krauss

Become a Fan

Recent Blog Posts on Measurement