Today, yet another "automated sentiment analysis" tool was introduced by Lewis PR. Called
Chatterscope it purports to let you know, FOR FREE!, what the market place is saying about you.
So when I retweeted Paul Holmes piece on the Barcelona Principles by calling it "good perspective on Barcelona" -- it counted that as positive.
or when Sean Williams (@CommAmmo) suggested that I had a "good question" -- it was again considered positive.
Multiply these errors by a thousand when you're dealing with a consumer brand, and just start thinking of the havoc that can be wreaked in marketing departments acrosss the country if people actually took this stuff seriously!


thanks to share
Posted by: Nactumu | July 03, 2010 at 06:25 PM
We depend so much on automated technology in social media. The advantage is that you task gets easier but at the same time if this technology miscalculates then you are out for a hard time.
Posted by: Ashwani | June 24, 2010 at 01:24 PM
So frustrating. The trouble with computers is that we have become so dependent on them, we don't know how to dig out from underneath their errors.
Posted by: Promotional Products | June 24, 2010 at 12:55 PM
Katie -- On top of everything else, Twitter is considered by computer scientists to be notoriously difficult for automated sentiment analysis due to the short text length, abbreviations, slang, lack of training data sets, and so on. There are some solid firms in the automated sentiment analysis domain. These others give text mining a bad name.
Posted by: David Geddes | June 23, 2010 at 04:20 PM
Katie:
We all know that computers are as smart as the people driving them. This is true in SM analysis as in all other fields of computing.
Smart ppl + sophisticated tools (software) = useful analysis ==> ideas + actionable insight.
TO'B
(more here - baking a social media cake): http://tinyurl.com/cgzts4 )
Posted by: Tom O'Brien | June 23, 2010 at 11:30 AM