I got a peek yesterday at yet another piece of the CGM puzzle that Paul Gillin would call "disruptive technology." Its called VendorRate and it allows B2B customers to anonymously rate vendors.
Think BizRate on steroids for the B to B marketplace. Most companies have policies about talking about vendors, but the completely anonymous environment changes that dynamic. You have to register and qualify to rate, so the system prohibits vendors from rating themselves.
Why should PR people care? and what does this have to do with measurement? you ask.
In the old days, it used to be that PR people "Launched" a product by talking to key journalists, issuing a press release and maybe having a launch tour or party. With luck, the right media would write about it, and with luck the right people would be influenced by those reviews and maybe buy the produce.
VendorRate takes that journalist/reviewer/analyst entirely out of the picture, and substitutes a reviewer that is much more likely to be trusted, according to most research. People are much more likely to trust people like themselves. So a trusted rating system by B2B reviewers is going to have much more credibility than the reviewers at TechCrunch, Engadget etc. In fact, in KDPaine & Partners own research we've found evidence that customer-generated reviews are more influential in the sales cycle than professional reviews.
So increasingly the onus is placed on the organization to have a good relationship with its customers, do the right thing, make good products, not just have the best "launch" or the best spin.
Where does that leave PR? Right where it should be. Working on improving the organizations trust and credibility (and, we hope, measuring it.) and improving relationships and communications between customers and employees. That is, unless they abdicate that to marketing.


Raddedas I believe that Vendorrate screens the reviews to ensure that you're not rating yourself or your competition. After that its up to the marketplace to "out" people doing bad things, I guess.
Posted by: kdpaine | March 06, 2008 at 02:04 PM
How do you prevent companies rating their competitors? In many cases you could have white labelling and other private deals going between them that could be rated, but no way to corroborate whether this is happening or whether in fact they bare just trying to make the competition look bad...
Posted by: raddedas | March 02, 2008 at 11:49 AM
Hear! Hear!
And relationships are on-going, where a cool launch is a one-time buzz event - and pretty much the price of admission these days.
Posted by: Spike Jones | February 27, 2008 at 01:15 PM