As you might imagine with the launch of our CGMDashboard we've been getting into a lot of conversations about what exactly "measuring CGM" really means. And what it means is a lot of manual analysis, despite all the assumptions about automation. Yes you can certainly go in and scrape content off blogs to see what people are writing. But what you aren't getting automatically is what's in the comments -- and that can contain far more important information than the original blog. To monitor comments you need to go to the actual blog, open it and read and analyze the comments. It's time consuming and a PITA, but that's how we do it, and that's how we would recommend anyone else doing it. Anyone have any better ideas?


An excellent point - blogs have information that can't be scraped, including sitemeter stats, trackbacks, links to other posts, and the general tone of the overall blog if it has multiple writers.
Not to mention that the growth of splogs (spam blogs) is crowding the more popular tracking software as e-spammers figure out how to game search engines for PPC ad revenue.
Posted by: Jim Durbin | April 12, 2006 at 12:32 PM